🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where Black people are paid to speak with white audiences about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The tide has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since its inception, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and more on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is observed is a indication of the current political situation. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a entirety.

In the America, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to remove African American heritage and experience from the archives is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how minimally it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is needed. Denise Miller, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Establishments who mark it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and reactive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.