🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate atomic discussions with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations worked, and revealed recent overtures had come from intermediaries to resume talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Difficult Path

Araghchi is walking a difficult path since Iran aims to avoid appear to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger defensively and mentally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the key factor of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the US president asserting the facilities had been obliterated. Following this, European countries employed their right to restore international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an local partnership with American involvement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the talks that US nuclear scientists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives declared the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in various formats if discussions reopen.

The US president recently said he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from the United States either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of inactivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Position

In his address to the conference, aimed to paint the US as a controlling nation that exploits the concept of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the 12-day war demonstrated the clash could not be ended by combat operations. He stated the assaults began with a US demand for an total Iran submission and ended with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were executed with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust challenging to restore.

Negotiations Remains the Ultimate Resolution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always sought to enforce their demands during the talks. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the final answer to settle conflicts, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"Provided that they talk to the nation of Iran with the language of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the same approach."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the battle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He stated: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to shatter. The Iranian people have developed more powerful, more united, and more endorsing of the government and the state in the face of this assault."