🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.