🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts about the remarks delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz during the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is American – and sports frequently encourage nationalism. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Instead, he brought up the ongoing absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, me too. But come on. Suppose Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, against whom the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (and the Spaniard proceeded to defeat a tired Serbian in the next round). Fritz said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact liked his path, because it offered the chance to beat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. He is well within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian quarter-final who else sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings starting the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with growing comfort. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and powerful power on both front side and reverse side are more than enough to dispose of the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the select few generational talents, though, he is frequently overmatched. The last several seasons has witnessed the curious emergence of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming speed and fluidity of smaller players. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a drop shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

Fritz has achieved a several significant, unexpected improvements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded to No 4 – and held the position. But the next leap, competing against and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing drought of American men lifting grand slams when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the All England Club last four in July.

Fritz’s play in that very quarter-final ought to have been enough of an indication. The Serbian triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only felt uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the point of frustration. When he finally did claim a single of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a horrendous game to drop serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and forced him to expend far too much effort to win it. Facing set points in the last game, his first serve sailed to the sky. He extended the match two times on his second serve, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, just a result of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was fairly compelling evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of the Serbian, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and did not especially seem like he believed he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has acquired enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in media sessions, exceeding almost everyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not only express his emotions or the tactic he felt decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States failing to produce a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unfair. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it forever if I don’t do it,” the American told an interviewer in the summer of claiming a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is actually highly unlikely for everybody else. {